CPC’s Deceptive Advertising Challenged in San Fran

                Crisis Pregnancy Centers are notorious for using misleading advertising to get women into them and then outright lying to the women once they come in. They list themselves as “abortion counseling” despite the fact that the only counseling provided is to shame and guilt them from having an abortion. One CPC in San Francisco, First Resort, even pays to have itself listed as a result in a Google search of “abortions in San Francisco.” Law makers in the city have decided enough is enough when it comes to the deceptive advertising from such centers and have passed an ordinance requiring they be clear about the fact that they don’t provide abortion services or referrals.

                First Resort’s mission statement says outright that their goal is to work towards “an abortion free world.” It makes sense that they would advertise in an ambiguous manner because if their goal is to stop women from having abortions, well they need to actually reach women who are thinking about it. That doesn’t justify using deceptive advertising. According to this definition deceptive advertising doesn’t have to be intentional to be illegal, it just has to implicitly or explicitly lead a consumer to believe a “claim that they might not realize is false.” While I seriously doubt First Resort isn’t intentionally advertising themselves as abortion providers it is easy to see why a consumer would believe they are. Not only do they come up in a search for “abortion in San Francisco,” their website states that they “provide counseling and medical care to women who are making decisions about unplanned pregnancies.” These practices clearly qualify as deceptive advertising and should be stopped.

                Similar laws in both New York City and Maryland have been overturned at the court level with the reasoning that they are unconstitutional. These laws both required CPC’s to state that they do not provide abortion services or referrals in their advertising so I can see the ambiguity of the laws. However I see no reason why they should be allowed to continue to mislead women in already stressful situations into their offices to try and cajole them out of having a safe and legally allowed procedure.

                It seems certain that if San Francisco vigorously pursues these new regulations, First Resort and other CPC’s will likely seek to have the law blocked from being enforced just as those in NYC and Maryland. It would be shameful if they succeeded, after all if a major soda company can’t imply their products cure cancer, CPC’s shouldn’t be allowed to imply that they provide abortions.

Advertisements

Tagged: , , ,

2 thoughts on “CPC’s Deceptive Advertising Challenged in San Fran

  1. Kelli Brelsford September 27, 2011 at 7:57 pm Reply

    Why isn’t the FCC involved here? What CPC’s are doing is, in a reather obvious way, false advertising.

    • womenhealthpros September 28, 2011 at 11:28 am Reply

      Really the FTC should be doing something, they are blatantly flouting the standards required to meet fair advertising, but I guess they don’t want to make this a federal issue and have been allowing local and state laws to officiate it. Unfortunately the state and local level laws don’t seem to be enough.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: